"Funny how when Clarence Thomas was nominated, the media invaded his privacy (and perhaps broke the law) by obtaining and publishing the list of videos he rented--in a clear attempt to disgrace and destroy him. Yet when a family willfully injects itself into a partisan political debate about income levels and government welfare, any available PUBLIC records regarding their income and assets are somehow off limits?"
WOW! EXCELLENT POINT!!!
270 posted on
10/12/2007 8:15:52 AM PDT by
SW6906
(6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)