Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dano1; Night Hides Not; dschapin; freekitty; org.whodat; apocalypto; Tolsti; investigateworld; ...

Dano1 and dschapin, you’re right that a lot of information being handed out on this thread is skewed. It’s going to be a real tragedy if people vote according to their opinions, rather than the facts.

Both Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich said that Huckabee is the most likely Republican candidate to win IF he can get enough funding to go forward. It would be a tragedy if voters continue being uneducated on this prospective nominee’s TRUE stands, and we lose this election.

Are most people here interested in the TRUTH at all?

According to the most historically accurate polling firm Rasmussen: Mike Huckabee is only 8 points behind Hillary and 9 points behind Obama.

Only one president came directly from the U.S. House – James Garfield – and that was 128 years ago. Only two people went directly from the Senate to the White House: Warren Harding (1920) and John F. Kennedy (1960). Four out of five of the last presidents were governors, and only one governor meets the life/marriage standard: Mike Huckabee.”

Rasmussin, Clinton, and Gingrich all agree: Huckabee can win. It can happen, but voters have to take time to educate themselves and stop swallowing the liberal mainstream media swill.

As Janet Folger said: “For everyone who is clamoring about the importance of money, keep in mind Huckabee came in second in Iowa at five cents on the dollar of what Romney spent to win. Newt Gingrich said on the same ABC program: “If Huckabee can find money, he will be dramatically competitive almost overnight.” NOW QUIT CLAMORING AND WRITE THE GUY A CHECK.”

When 28 million evangelical Christians sat home in 2006, we handed the keys of power in Congress to those who hate us. (Btw, the last I heard - Christians are still allowed to vote and run for office in this country. Afterall, half of those who signed the Declaration of Independence were Christian ministers.)

What’s at stake in this election is whether partial-birth abortion is performed on your 12-year-old daughter without your knowledge or consent. It’s the loss of your freedom to homeschool your kids. It’s the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms. It’s your freedom to speak out on issues of importance to you without being persecuted for hate speech. It’s the privilege of continuing to hear conservative talk radio without having the Fairness Doctrine shoved down your throat. The very sovereignty of America hangs on this election, because if a Democrat wins and we get a Democrat majority in both houses, you can welcome international treaties to trump our Constitution. You then lose your parental rights through the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. You lose property rights through other U.N. treaties aiming for America.

Choose Thompson, Guiliani, Romney, or McCain – and you welcome socialist Hillary or Obama into the White House to give you the nightmare above. America will be changed forever for the worse.

Educate yourselves please...FOR THE SAKE OF THIS COUNTRY!


79 posted on 10/09/2007 10:51:33 AM PDT by USA Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: USA Girl

I have. I know more about Hucks record than he does.


80 posted on 10/09/2007 10:53:43 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: USA Girl
Are most people here interested in the TRUTH at all?

I am. If you can somehow prove that he's not a nanny statist, then I'm all ears.

But you can't, because he is.
82 posted on 10/09/2007 11:00:43 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: USA Girl

You seem to think my beef with Huckabee is because he’s a Christian? My candidate is also a Christian. He’s pro-life and has delivered 4000 babies with his own hands. My candidate has never voted for a tax increase or for an unbalanced budget. My candidate can also beat Obama or Clinton because while they continue to support the war in Iraq, my candidate does not. And unlike Huckabee, my candidate isn’t a statist.


86 posted on 10/09/2007 11:23:53 AM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: USA Girl
Both Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich said that Huckabee is the most likely Republican

With you that means he gets three votes, but I wouldn't count on old bill.

96 posted on 10/09/2007 1:40:24 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson