I realize that you are doing your best to aid the liberal cause here, but a couple of things stand out. 1) They have a combined income of supposedly 45,000 with 4 kids. 2) somehow they not only feed and clothe these kids on this, but have what appears to be a very nice home even if it is “only” worth 300K 3)With 4 kids I’m sure they pay virtually NO taxes. 4) Pre-existing conditions can be covered under medicaid if they are serious enough (and nothing indicates that they had one) 5) No other details emerge from the accident, but according to the story it was in the family SUV. No mention of whether it was the mother’s fault, or why they didn’t have car insurance (maybe you expect taxpayers to pay for that too) 6) The family is obviously liberal activists (by the stickers on their car) 7) The family can afford tattoos 8) They can afford NYTimes wedding announcements 9)the hard-working family can “afford” to take a week off to record anti-Bush scripted advertisements.
Sorry, no sale on the pity angle. Too many questions. The fact that they were liberal activists long before this seals the deal for me.
I’m not aiding the liberal cause, I’m trying to maintain the credibility of the conservative cause. If just ONE point in this “expose” of how the Frost’s really have gobs of money is clearly shown to be false, then the whole thing will be ridiculed and the credibility of all the websites that promoted it will take a big hit too. It’s extremely unlikely that the family was actually paying $40,000 a year or anything close to that to this private school, and yet that’s being asserted as a “fact” here. If we can’t make an argument without fabricating “facts” out thin air, why should anyone think our argument should be taken seriously?