Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brytlea
You raise good points. My statement about letting him and others stay if they met certain conditions was based on them meeting certain minimum standards.

When Senator Coryn of Texas proposed even lower standards during the first amnesty discussion in May, very basic things like excluding gang members and felons, his amendment was voted down by our overlords.

It showed they were in no mood to make even basic concessions to us mere sheeple. By showing their true intentions, I think it woke a lot of sheeple to flood the phone lines during the next big amnesty push.

49 posted on 10/06/2007 7:32:46 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman
Yeah.
I don’t think an issue has ever frustrated me quite so much. It is clear they don’t have our best interests at heart, and it is clear that much of the American public is STILL asleep! Otherwise they would be taking to the streets en-mass.
susie
50 posted on 10/06/2007 7:35:48 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson