Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roberts
I think this is a serious enough offense for the people who fund him,

The advertisers do not "fund" him. He makes them big stacks of cash, even if he charges confiscatory ad rates.

26 posted on 10/04/2007 1:34:28 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Fred Thompson 2008, no need to "suspend disbelief" with him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NeoCaveman
The advertisers do not "fund" him. He makes them big stacks of cash, even if he charges confiscatory ad rates.

If anything Rush funds the advertisers.

71 posted on 10/04/2007 1:48:22 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: NeoCaveman
He makes them big stacks of cash, even if he charges confiscatory ad rates.

Now now such language. ; )

It's not really confiscatory if

a.-No one forces you to buy the ads and
b.-You make a seriously healthy return on the money invested.

But that's beside the point. They should still be charged with hate crimes.

252 posted on 10/04/2007 8:23:03 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson