Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob J
Guili will keep things in stasis, Hillary will be pedal to the medal. Take your pick.

You have things backward. Giuliani is far more likely to get liberal legislation passed than Hillary. Liberal legislation promoted by Giuliani will meet no resistance from Republicans while the same legislation would be filibustered by Republicans if Hillary were President.

A Giuliani Presidency would further diminish the number of Republicans in Congress while a Hillary Presidency likely would return the GOP to the majority in Congress.

You don't seem to understand that liberalism had advanced more under George W. Bush than it ever did under Bill Clinton because of the factors I just mentioned. Bush has expanded government at the fastest rate since Lyndon Johnson because Republicans refused to stop socialism pushed by the leader of their own party. We got a balanced budget and welfare reform under Clinton because Republicans took back Congress.

181 posted on 10/04/2007 11:28:58 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky
...liberalism had advanced more under George W. Bush than it ever did under Bill Clinton...

Who did Bill Clinton nominate to the SC and who did Bush nominate? Are you saying you'd rather have Clinton than Bush if you were able to choose between the two???

410 posted on 10/04/2007 7:09:22 PM PDT by Proudcongal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson