They're not meaningless. They may not mean that Ron Paul cannot win NH and/or Texas but they certainly show he has much work to do in those states to either a) get some people to notice him and/or b) convince them his policies are good ideas and executable. So while the polls may not be a true predictor of what will happen, they certainly show that without a major shift, he will not win either state.
the blogs got Paul at 25%.
What does this even mean? Seriously. I'm hardly anti-blog, but I don't know how this statement means anything at all. To say "polls are meaningless" and then to follow that statement with "the blogs got Paul at 25%" is odd, to say the least.
Wow, you’re admitting the Paul cannot even win Texas? How can the fool run for president if he cannot win his own state?