And I find it odd that you would label that statement a "Woefully inadequate mini-doc".
Would you prefer a 10,000 page government statement or study, made by 86 different government committees, that takes years to produce?
Hmmm.
I'd say his statement was, to the point, and right on the money and makes more sense that Bush's entire 6 plus years of this open border, lawless free for all.
And I find it odder still, in turn, that you're flailing about so desperately in the patent attempt to distract from the original point under discussion
Uh, I was just commenting on the article in the link provided by the other poster, while you seem consumed by some tit for tat word game you're playing with the person who posted the link to the statement on immigration.
The statement or the link regarding immigration makes perfect sense, no?
How embarrassing. For you.
Please don't attempt to clumsily change the subject under discussion by frantically hopping up and down and pinwheeling your arms like that. For the record: by your "yes, yes," then, I take you -- as another vocal and (putatively) knowledgeable Ron Paul supporter -- are admitting, openly, that the assertion that Ron Paul would ensure that "Muslims would be banned from immigrating here" is, in plain point of fact, a great, whopping, steaming pile? A simple, straightforward YES or NO, please.
Why are you so strenuously avoiding doing so, I don't wonder...?