Dobson an adult. <>Principle's and politics? Never heard of it.
Actually, he is just keeping his face in the news. Keeping the Dobson, Inc. corporation going.
We live in a political state, not religious, so earthly definitions are by politics. Murder is variably defined by states and over time.
The state can not even fill potholes. It does not stop drugs, nor murder, nor rape nor bad taste. It is a delusion. The delusion that ink on paper, bound in leather, shelved on oak and employing slumberng state minions could find, prosecute, and suppress abortion, which is motivated by gross and widespread malicious values is, again, delusional.
The very nature of the state rests on killing, as much as taxes require deaths to be paid. You think fishermen, miners, factory workers and countless others are not at sea twice as much because they are ordered to pay taxes? They do, and thus their death and maim rates are twice what they would be. Same in most physical occupations. Taxes are paid in blood and death. Those that readily accept state assistance are complicit.
So the seemingly shocking idea of the state being in blood and murder is anything but. Frankly what is the difference between the state and abortion and the fact that millions of responsible couples do not even have children because they are so taxed they can little afford them?
The Catholic Church says the crime begins even before condoms. Why should the state fool around with your definition? Under a Catholic state you would be criminal.
Anyways, religious people looking to the state for anything other than theft and crime wrapped up in the whore cloak of state respectability need to educated themselves. I do not remember anywhere where Jesus advocation any, at all, not once, guidance from the state.
Your Statement - “So the seemingly shocking idea of the state being in blood and murder is anything but. Frankly what is the difference between the state and abortion and the fact that millions of responsible couples do not even have children because they are so taxed they can little afford them?”
My Responce -
This comment is so outrageous that I don’t even know where to begin in responding to it. If you believe that there is no difference between couples choosing not to have children and dismembering a living innocent child then I am ashamed that you call yourself a Republican. If you simply want a strong leader who has no regard for morality but is anti-communist, fiscally conservative, and will support a strong military then you should have lived in 1932 and voted for Hitler. Fortunately, most Republicans do see that the murder of innocent is a horrible unjustice - I fear what our nation would become if more people were to adopt your views.