Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL
From the article: "The change, Democrats had complained, would benefit the GOP - and perhaps alter the outcome of the 2008 presidential election. "

The change, if it was to spread nation-wide, would have assured that the populous states, which include the largest liberal cities, would have dominated the election.

The present Electoral College mechanism limits our exposure to vote-stealing. It does no good for Demoncrats to steal votes in Kalifornia, where liberals have the political power to steal votes, because the winner-takes-all system already awards them all of Kalifornia's votes.

Instead, to steal an election, the liberals are forced to attempt theft of votes in states which are dominated by conservatives, or at least where conservatives have a slight majority.

Those who support eliminating the Electoral College winner-takes-all, should also support eliminating the US Senate, since that body represents states, not people.

15 posted on 09/28/2007 12:27:34 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell; SierraWasp
Those who support eliminating the Electoral College winner-takes-all, should also support eliminating the US Senate, since that body represents states, not people.

True. I think we call those people liberals.

Prior threads seemed to be full of cheerleaders supporting this initiative. I wonder where they are today.

17 posted on 09/28/2007 12:38:05 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson