Oh, pleaze.... Would they have changed what they had to say on camera if they knew what the real intentions had been? Would they even had appeared on camera?
I certainly don't condone what these people did to get these scientists talk, but don't go making this out to be one sided. These scientists have their agenda as well and they just happened to be caught with their guard down.
And please consider the source-The New York Time. Great for wrapping fish guts in.
“And please consider the source-The New York Time. Great for wrapping fish guts in.”
...and also replaces TP in the bathroom
Dawkins and the others are only upset that they for once, aren’t in control and their squirmy thoughts are being dragged out into the light and finally scrutinized. They have brow-beaten and intimidated little kids for so long, that like the intellectual bullies they are, they react with anger when confronted by someone their own size. All I can say is Good for Stein and it’s about time
Another scientist who was, P. Z. Myers, a biologist at the University of Minnesota, Morris, said the film’s producers had misrepresented its purpose, but said he would have agreed to an interview anyway. But, he said in a posting on The Panda’s Thumb Web site, he would have made a “more aggressive” attack on the claims of the movie.Any more bogus questions?
I wouldn’t wrap fish in the New York Times.
It would make the fish smell.
I prefer to not soil my fish guts with the stench of the NYT.