Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snarkybob

[That’s a good question,]

Yes it is.

[but it has nothing to do with what we were discussing.]

Mainstreaming autistic children is government mandated redistribution of resources that would otherwise be utilized by non-autistic children.

Why should educational resources be taken away from non-autistic children for the benefit of autistic children?

 


189 posted on 09/24/2007 11:59:25 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: VxH
Why should educational resources be taken away from non-autistic children for the benefit of autistic children?

Not that this is on topic, but why must I pay for your kids to go to school when I am sending my child to a special school so he can get the help he needs but can't get there.

The logic is simple, if you are going to force everyone to pay in, you have to be available for every one.

I am ready right now for them to cut my taxation for the School, and let me pay my own way (all my other kids are in private school which I pay for out of pocket, so I am a net plus for you)

Now back tot he topic, is the Six year old the responsible person, or is the Supposed adult?
210 posted on 09/24/2007 1:07:33 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson