Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 91B
Here are just a few of the post by you where you are clearly trying to impugned the General's right to the award. That despite the fact all the information on it had been posted to you by various Freepers. Now that you have had your face rubbed in your error, you are desperately trying to rewrite history rather then simply admit you were wrong. Rather then continue to spin desperately for some hair splitting rational to avoid admitting error, just deal with it. You were wrong.

Post 21

Some of the guys I drill with were wondering about his CAB (Combat Action Badge) as combat badges are not generally awarded to General officers. I am not really certain as to what the regulation is about awarding the CAB though, but perhaps this is what the Kossacks are refering to. Post 43 Haig never wore a CAB as it is a new award that has only been awarded since the start of the GWOT. He probably wore a CIB (Combat Infantryman’s Badge) which he earned as a junior officer in WWII (or Korea). Patraeus may have been awarded the CAB-I am unsure of the regulation-but combat badges are generally not awarded to senior officers.

Post 47

I am not sure what AR 60-8-22 says about the CAB. I believe that it says that the CMB is not to be awarded to officers above the rank of Colonel-and says the same about the CIB. There may not be any similar restriction on award of the CAB, but that is the only thing I can think of that might apply (other than the Kossacks being full of crap).

Post 58

I think it is infinitely more likely that he earned the BSM with V in a previous conflict as he was a division commander in Iraq and probably wasn’t as likely to be in position to show valor (commanders usually have a PSD to protect them). As I said, some of the guys I drill with were wondering about the CAB-I am unsure about the requirements under the regulation.

Post 67

I’m tracking-see my reply 47. I personally know soldiers who served a full tour in Iraq whose CAB was denied for what I think were trivial interpretations of the regulation. Because of that, I think it is entirely appropriate to ask questions when I see a General officer wearing it.

Post 162

I understand. I am not personally eligible for the CAB (instead I have been awarded the CMB). However, when we were deployed several of the soldiers attached to our squadron were denied their CAB in cases that were never adequately explained (for instance two of the guys in a HWMMV that was hit by an IED got it while the other two did not). It makes me raise an eyebrow to see a General officer wearing it.

241 posted on 09/23/2007 8:11:53 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

Johnnie-I’ve forgotten more about what it takes to qualify for a combat award than you’ll ever know-and I’m not talking about regulations. If you choose to go into fits of apoplexy because I wonder at a General officer wearing an award that I have seen other soldiers turned down for, that’s your prerogative. I’m not the only poster to have commented on such behavior on your part.


242 posted on 09/23/2007 8:20:10 AM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson