Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PAR35
I notice in all of your descriptions, you carefully avoid mentioning the Play-Do and its purpose

Well, since the flashing LED's are clearly not a detonator as half the passenger traffic through Boston Logan (one of three leading education and technology centers in the US) could have told these idiot security hacks, then what is the purpose of the Play-Doh? I think they need to answer and explain their perfervid paranoid imaginings before she needs to say a word.

If I traveled with my 3-year old son (back when he was 3) with a Playschool radio (which is a whole lot more suspicious a decoy than a breadboard w/flashing LED's) and a can of playdoh, am I resposonsible for "causing alarm?" Or is the fault a bunch of sub 100 IQ security weenies who work security because they don't have the brains to get a job that is even slightly more interesting than rifling through bags of dirty linen.

73 posted on 09/22/2007 9:29:38 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson
Well, since the flashing LED's are clearly not a detonator

I'm glad you have the ability to see through opaque objects to tell what is or is not fastened to the back of it. I'm one of the many folks in the country that can't.

74 posted on 09/22/2007 9:35:14 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: AndyJackson
If I traveled with my 3-year old son (back when he was 3) with a Playschool radio (which is a whole lot more suspicious a decoy than a breadboard w/flashing LED's) and a can of playdoh, am I resposonsible for "causing alarm?"

And, by the way, glad to know that if you were running security, you would have let through the bomb that brought down Pan Am Flight 103 (a radio boom box and explosive).

On the other hand, if you pulled the stunt with a radio and Play Doh, if I was on the jury, you could expect a rather long time to contemplate your actions while enjoying federal hospitality.

77 posted on 09/22/2007 9:38:45 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: AndyJackson

“Or is the fault a bunch of sub 100 IQ security weenies who work security because they don’t have the brains...”

You, sir, are an elitist snob, and likely not fit to shine the shoes of these men and women who daily take their lives in their hands, and provide that fine line of defense between civilization and chaos.

I suggest it stems from a substandard IQ.


145 posted on 09/22/2007 1:37:54 PM PDT by jim35 ("...when the lion and the lamb lie down together, ...we'd better damn sure be the lion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson