Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Malsua
Furthermore, bomb aren't advertised, EVER. They don't have blinking lights on them. You see blinking lights, you see bomb, that's movie training, not real world bomb identification.

But she's not being charged with making a real bomb. She's charged with making a hoax bomb. If you wanted to freak people out and have a laugh at their expense, making a hollywood light-show hoax bomb is the way to do it, not making a reasonable facsimile of a real bomb and hiding it under your jacket. What would that have accomplished?

246 posted on 09/22/2007 10:43:41 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls
She's charged with making a hoax bomb

And because that is what she is charged with she must be guilty, I guess, even though the hoax isn't much of a hoax because instead of trying to make something that actually looked like a bomb she made this star shaped light thing that doesn't actually look much like a bomb.

Of course she is so smart that she should have known that dumb idiots would think the think that wasn't supposed to look like a bomb would think it looks like a bomb.

So it is all her fault, because she should have known that the security forces that are supposed to deal with bombs was never trained to know what one looked like either.

You are still an idiot.

250 posted on 09/22/2007 11:02:50 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson