There might be a significant basis for an investors’ suit against Clinton, et al, on the grounds that they negligently failed to check Hsu out adequately before they endorsed him, giving him the veneer of respectability that he then traded on and used to rope the investors into his various Ponzi schemes. Among other things, such a suit would force Clinton, et al, to reveal how much of a background check they actually made on him, from which could come a trove of other information. Right now one thing is absolutely sure: Clinton and the whole DemonRAt establishment bent over backwards to give Hsu as much fake respectability as possible, going even so far as to get him onto the board of the New School in New York.
Civil court cases might force the liars into disclosure that can have far reaching consequences versus criminal cases where they can take the 5th or “I can’t recall!”.