Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RochesterFan

“Yes. And wherever one draws the line, when someone just over the line gets caught, questions will re-surface.”

There might actually be some wisdom in the choices teens have made most often over the years. Just my observation, it seemed that a guy two years older than a girl was the most common age difference. Same age and one year difference next, and three year difference less common, and four year difference getting into “robbing the cradle” territory for kids still in high school. The four and greater year difference seldom happened until the younger party was out of high school. - Things might be different some places.

And, some cases where the girl was older, but when a boy is beyond three years or grades older, that starts seeming too much while still in high school. Sixteen seems right for age of consent, but I don’t think many sixteen year-olds considered fifteen, or even fourteen year-olds jail bait. I think the kids were/are more cognizant of the age difference than the age of consent.


248 posted on 09/22/2007 12:31:59 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]


To: Will88
don’t think many sixteen year-olds considered fifteen, or even fourteen year-olds jail bait.

Ignorance of the law has rarely been accepted as justification. If parents resurfaced from their busy lives once in a while and actually taught their sons, perhaps such willful ignorance would be remedied. Those who espouse 'liberty' must, by necessity, accept 'responsibility.'

252 posted on 09/22/2007 12:38:02 PM PDT by RochesterFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson