the leo will just turn up somewhere else.
We saw the footage on our local news. He needed to be gotten rid of. I would hope, and assume that his actions doesn’t and wouldn’t reflect that of the entire squad. I never even thought of it.
Good for Darrow. Kid has huevos to go after the corrupt thugs. I am sure he has learned to remain very visible to prevent the thug’s buddies from giving him an “attitude adjustment”.
Here’s one of the threads on FR.
Officer in trouble over motorist’s video in South County(Cop caught threatening to invent Charges)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1895311/posts?page=53
St. Louis Post-Dispatch ^ | 09/11/2007 | By Patrick M. O’Connell and Georgina Gustin
This kind of stuff happens all the time, but now that cameras are cheap & plentiful, we’ll see more proof of it. That’s one way to hold LEO’s to their own professed code of ethics.
Good. I watched the tape. That goon didn’t deserve a badge. LEO’s like him make the job harder for honest cops.
What? It’s illegal to beat motorists now?
Good outcome. What the cop did in my opinion is also illegal and he should be at least charged with menacing, pay a $250 fine and be on probation for a year. That seems like something a non-cop citizen would get if they did something like that.
“Kuehnlein should have been taping the encounter himself with his police car’s camera.”
this part makes it pretty clear that the cop premeditated
Justice is served!
Where’s the video
Missouri: Cop Website Contained Apparent Death Threat Against Video Vigilante
When stopped by an out-of-control St. George, Missouri police officer last Friday, motorist Brett Darrow feared for his life (view story and video). It turns out, he had legitimate reason for concern. Three months ago, participants in an online forum frequented by Saint Louis law enforcement personnel threatened to harass -- and even physically harm -- Darrow.