Replies

By treaty she can’t, but perhaps he could be issued a very severely limited access visa: Airport to UN and back to airport. US institutions off limits.

By treaty she can’t"

This would be a great time to re-visit that treaty, and the whole issue of the UN. Announce that he is barred from US shores and that we are renouncing the idiotic UN treaty!! (I know that won't happen, but I can dream) My belief is that we need to abolish the UN, keep all these dogsh** dictators and their flunkies away from US shores, and announce a new global organization only for democracies and some other close allies who are moving toward better government. We do not need to be the chief sponsor (and funder) for the dungheap of the UN.

As for claims that the UN is necessary as a forum for all nations, a meeting place with Russia and China, NO. It might have seemed like a good idea in 1945, but the past 60 years have shown what a farce it is much of the time.

We don't need to give the world's worst governments such a forum, we need to elevate the position and influence of all the friendly governments that share at least enough of the values of freedom and democracy not to be complete repressive dungheaps ala much of the Middle East, Africa, and yes Russia and China. We can meet the latter two powers 1-on-1 when desireable, we don't need to give them heightened influence on the Security Council.

You Nailed IT!

This Asshat can be limited as to his Travel in this Country!

NO BODY HAS THE BALL$ TO IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS!