He didn't specify the precise breakdown. Let's say 200 came from Ron Paul forums, 75 from Stormfront, and 125 from regular internet traffic. 75 nuts, even less if they're technically adept poll-pushers, could be the of this sloppy guilt by association smear.
Basing outrage on stats from 400 unique visitors is stupid stupid stupid stupid.
I think the issue presented by this news item is simply this: Stormfront and what seems like a sunsidiary thereof, RonPaulforums, have been doing their best to do the equivalent of Freeping polls for Ron Paul. That Paul has inspired the fervent loyalty of Stormfront is noteworthy, I believe, especially since Paul supporters on FR love to cite such results as evidence that Paul is more popular than the 3% ratings he gets in most polls.
On the other hand (and I doubt this is wht the thread or Petronski were TRYING to say), this insignificantly tiny datapoint hardly is evidence that anyone who supports Paul is likely to be a member of Stormfront or any other such organization, or that Paul has in any way condoned or solicited such support.