Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lormand
What he was doing was an elementary school level debate tactic. You ask several questions in which you know the poster will agree and you are leading that person to a specific point you want. All of these small questions result in something like Wouldn't you agree then that XX is right about XX.
It's an old tactic, you cause the person to make several agreeing statements on simple items to a point where if you don't agree with their final conclusion you are in a corner and have to go back several levels in order to restate something. You've then lost credibility.
324 posted on 09/21/2007 7:03:24 AM PDT by mnehring (Thompson/Hunter 08 -- Fred08.com - The adults have joined the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]


To: mnehrling
It's an old tactic, you cause the person to make several agreeing statements on simple items to a point where if you don't agree with their final conclusion you are in a corner and have to go back several levels in order to restate something. You've then lost credibility.

A hearty laugh and good humor in the morning does a soul wonders. Thanks for that mnehrling!

367 posted on 09/21/2007 9:37:35 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson