[TankerKC]

It's not just the fonts (as if that weren't enough), but the memos were done in a format (headings, signature block alignment) that the USAF (and, therefore the ANG) didn't adopt until the early 1990's.

Who ever forged these documents was adept and creating USAF correspondence, but didn't know that the style change.

[NonValueAdded]

Thank you, Tanker, for your role in the “blog shot heard round the world” You were Lexington to Buckhead’s Concord. Your “WE NEED TO SEE THOSE MEMOS AGAIN” real-time comment was the spark that lit the fuse. Knowing how that thread played out made it all the more incredible. Way to Go, FRiend!!!

[Waryone]

If the cBS lawyers were smart they’d be combing through these threads to help their case. Thanks to you and Buckhead, they did not get away with their forgeries.

[oldbill]

It’s not just about the fonts NOR the formats.

What is in those documents (as Mary Mapes would say, the content) is what proves their fakery. There are things in those documents that could not have occurred in 1972-73.

For example, there are some references that did not exist until a blogger named Lukasiak created them in 2004.

Dan is correct in one aspect - CBS and Thornburgh knew about some of this but kept it out of the report to avoid liability for CBS.