Posted on 09/16/2007 11:40:42 AM PDT by processing please hold
I agree.
could it be more for control of our people with surveillance and travel documents than about protecting our nation from foreign intrusion?
They want to know where and what law abiding American are up to. Why don't they redirect that energy into throwing out illegal aliens and their families and leave us the hell alone.
But I guess that would defeat the purpose of open borders.
Now....I didn’t say ACT like a crook....just think like one.
To catch a crook, you gotta stay one step ahead of them; that means you have to try to THINK that way....cynicism helps.
: )
Just let the UN kangaroo court try to prosecute Bush!
I thnk the DemoRats have first shot but they don’t have enough manly men to put a scare on a wet piece of toilet paper. Same for the United Nobodys. All talk. No action.
>>>I thnk the DemoRats have first shot but they don’t have enough manly men to put a scare on a wet piece of toilet paper.
THAT is funny!!!!
Oh hell, I can act like one, no problem. LOL
foflol! Oh no...the truth’s out now. : )
Mexico must be benefitting from this somehow...
ty for the ping, ot.
shhhhhh, that’s just between you and me. Don’t tell anybody.
I suspect the latter. Something about even stopped clocks being right twice a day comes to mind.
oh...okay.
chant with me: *your posts are invisible*
: )
Mexico supports unclos
Mexico
Declaration made after ratification (6 January 2003)
Declarations under articles 287 and 298
In accordance with the terms of article 287 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Government of Mexico declares that it chooses, in no order of preference, one of the following means for the settlement of disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention:
1. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea established in accordance with annex VI;
2. The International Court of Justice;
3. A special arbitral tribunal constituted in accordance with annex VIII for one or more of the categories of disputes specified therein.
"The Government of Mexico declares that, pursuant to article 298 of the Convention, it does not accept the procedures provided for in part XV, section 2, with respect to the following categories of disputes:
1. Disputes relating to sea boundary delimitations, or those involving historic bays or titles, pursuant to paragraph 1 (a) of article 298;
2. Disputes concerning military activities and the other activities referred to in paragraph 1 (b) of article 298.
Hmmmmmm, hmmmmmmm, hmmmmmmm. Hey, it worked. I don't see them. lolololol
lolol!!
PING!
Ever see this one?
http://justwhatithink.com/blog/zedilloandclinton.html
“1997 - Mexican President Zedillo and EX President Clinton Celebrate New Amendment For Mexican Dual Citizenship”
In May the Bush Administration at the behest of career diplomats in the State Department urged the United States Senate to ratify all provision of the Treaty and the vote for this ratification begins on September 27th. In the past either a Republican President like Reagan or a Republican Majority in the Senate has blocked any ratification of the treaty. Now with a Democrat Majority who favors all UN control provides a distinct possibility of fully ratifying this treaty.
Alowly i have been losing faith in Mr. Bush...This is close to the last straw..How could he allow the UN to have any say whatsoever over US Policy or risk having the US hauled before an International Tribunal over violation of these treaty provisions.....UGH...it is time for Bush to go...Newt is right—we have to make a clean break if the Reps are to win in ‘08...
sonofa.....No I haven’t. Thank you. Bookmarked.
>>>In the past either a Republican President like Reagan or a Republican Majority in the Senate has blocked any ratification of the treaty.
Please read post 31.
I wonder how any American politician could sell out their own country's sovereignty without even a look back. It's astounding, positivity astounding.
The time limit on unclos being ratified is 2009.
I lost faith in him doing what's right for our country's interest a while back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.