Posted on 09/16/2007 11:30:21 AM PDT by Halls
Edited on 09/16/2007 12:26:37 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
O.J. Simpson has been arrested in Las Vegas and will likely be charged on three counts -- conspiracy to commit armed robbery, armed robbery and armed robbery with a deadly weapon, according to CNN.
Story developing ...
good grief- been out and about- come back and find Fox is still ALL OJ all the time...
What a hoot!
OMG.....GERALDO is going NUTS!
“Is it not true they were cowering in fear”??
this is hilarious and the news is going to have this covered for God knows how long!
He would look better in the pink jumpsuit,don’t you think?
Best thing on FOX was the reminder of all the security cams in the casino and how everything must have been caught on tape.
Ballona Creek? Are you serious?
If the dumbass couldn’t run and catch a football he’d have been in for life a long,long time ago.
There won’t be any room tape but everything else is on camera. I was at the station last year playing cards and their was cameras everywhere, just like the majors.
their=there
Hey, O-Jaaayyyyyyy.....hope ya spend some quality time behind bars with a really, really frustrated pervert who will take advantage of your "arthritic inability to commit strenuous actions".
Ya moe-ron.
Father, forgive me my schadenfrude.
I don’t normally find this stuff interesting- but something about seeing OJ getting his- is just irresistable to me.
For a Sunday afternoon it’s fun- but if (of course they will) they overdo the coverage during the week it will get old FAST.
ALL the reporters are simply breathless...
such a hottie...
I saw that interview this morning. ((DRAMA))
That’s Dr. Keith Ablow. He has a show on FOX.
Unfortunately, he is “Johnny One Note” about narcissists and narcissism - he sees them everywhere, in everything. It got real old after he made his “name” on TV with the Peterson case.
That’s whats happening IMHO.
since it seems the media still isn’t reporting the history behind OJ and the two ‘victims,’ I posted this on another thread but I’ll re-post here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6575548/
Friend to testify in O.J. Simpson wrongful death suit
Oct. 27, 2004, 10:22 a.m. ET
SANTA MONICA, Calif. (AP) — A friend of O.J. Simpson has been ordered to appear in court regarding the finances of the former football star, who was acquitted of double murder but slapped with a $33.5 million settlement that remains unpaid to the victims’ families.
Alfred Beardsley must appear Nov. 23 in Los Angeles Superior Court in Santa Monica. The order, issued Tuesday, was at the request of Fred Goldman, whose son Ron Goldman was brutally stabbed to death along with Nicole Brown Simpson.
Fred Goldman’s attorney wrote in a declaration filed with the court that Beardsley “has knowledge” of Simpson’s “financial condition” and of his “non-exempt property, which may be ordered to be applied to the satisfaction of the judgment.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/05/22/how-much-would-you-pay-for-oj-simponss-not-guilty-suit/
As TMZ reports, a war has ensued over the impending sale of the suit OJ Simpson was wearing in court on the day of hit “Not Guilty” verdict.
David Cook, the lawyer for Fred Goldman (father of the man Simpson slaughtered), filed legal papers Monday in Santa Monica asking a judge to grab that suit.
[Memorabilia salesman Alfred Beardsley] said he had a conference call this morning with Cook and Kim Goldman. Beardsley says he plans to acquire the suit, and the trio talked about the Goldmans getting a percentage of the sale to help satisfy the outstanding judgment. The court could engineer the ground rules tomorrow.
Just the way I’ve felt ever since the verdict for the civil suit was handed down, any cent made by OJ, because of OJ, or anything related to the trial, should go to the Goldmans until they are completely paid off. Beardsley says he could get $100,000 for the suit. That seems like an awfully lot for me. But who am I to talk? That’s a bargain compared to $10,000 for Luis Gonzalez’s chewing gum. At least the winning bidder can rock it to a Bar Mitzvah or something. My only question: does it come with the tie?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Two dealers in sports memorabilia testified for the defense. Bruce Fromongis a full time employee of the California Department of Corrections but also isself-employed as a dealer in sports memorabilia and part owner of a sports cardshop in Lincoln City, Oregon. He directed sales and marketing for Locker 32, acompany that deals primarily in Simpson memorabilia.
During the criminal trial there was a frenzy of demand for Simpson memorabilia, but a few months after the criminal verdict this demand subsided. He testified that in the six months prior tothis trial (February 1997) he had sold only 10 pieces wholesale and four piecesretail. At a recent trade show he could not find a single dealer interested in purchasing Simpson memorabilia.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19981367/
Celebrity scandal sells well on eBay’s dark side
-snip-
“Because it has an air about it,” said Bruce Fromong, seller of the O.J. suit, which comes with jacket, pants, shirt and tie. The shirt collar has a blood stain where Simpson nicked himself shaving that morning, Oct. 3, 1995. The jacket has a makeup smudge left by Simpson’s sister during a post-verdict hug. Fromong said he has been trying to sell the suit for its owner, Simpson’s former agent Mike Gilbert, who got the ensemble as a gift from the ex-NFL star
-snip-
“Very interesting. Robbing a couple of memorabilia traders is one thing, but robbing the IRS..”
Yeah. Just ask Al Capone.
Interesting, but not as important as the LOST treaty being signed, or Dick Durbin selling out our sovereignty.
Wake up folks, OJ is an unimportant little killer. I want him out too. The media focuses on this instead of what it is that effects us all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.