Skip to comments.
Climb On Board The 'Ron Paul Revolution'
TheDay ^
| 9/16/2007
| Marc Guttman
Posted on 09/16/2007 8:53:29 AM PDT by NapkinUser
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-336 next last
To: NapkinUser
2
posted on
09/16/2007 8:54:22 AM PDT
by
guido911
(Islamic terrorists are members of the "ROP", the "religion of pu*&ies")
To: NapkinUser
3
posted on
09/16/2007 8:55:20 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Cleveland Indians: Pennant -9)
To: NapkinUser
I’d vote for the Hildabeast before I’d vote for this isolationist kook. OK, I’d never vote for the beast, but you get my drift.
4
posted on
09/16/2007 8:56:08 AM PDT
by
jim35
("...when the lion and the lamb lie down together, ...we'd better damn sure be the lion")
To: NapkinUser
I think this train has left the station with a bunch of conductors and no passengers.
To: Petronski
6
posted on
09/16/2007 8:57:20 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
To: jim35
Id vote for the Hildabeast before Id vote for this isolationist kook.
Please reconsider.
7
posted on
09/16/2007 8:58:27 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: NapkinUser
8
posted on
09/16/2007 8:59:38 AM PDT
by
KDD
(A nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse)
To: jim35
“Id vote for the Hildabeast before Id vote for this isolationist kook.”
Ha...I’d vote for rudi before I’d vote for Paul...and I’ll NEVER vote for rudi.
9
posted on
09/16/2007 9:00:33 AM PDT
by
gate2wire
To: NapkinUser
He’s al Qaeda’s favorite candidate; he knows their grievances; he feels their pain; he’s willing to give into their stated desires. Elect Run Paul and you elect a man who is such a dupe and a dope that al Qaeda will have a strategic victory over the US. He makes Benedict Arnold and Jane Fonda look like patriotic Americans.
10
posted on
09/16/2007 9:01:36 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(RUN Paul - a man proudly putting al Qaeda's interest ahead of America's.)
To: NapkinUser
Perot Part Deaux. Its funny how history repeats itself. Like Peort, Paul will allow a Clinton into the White House. What else is funny is how we continue to fail in learning from history..
11
posted on
09/16/2007 9:01:41 AM PDT
by
cardinal4
(http://artoriuscastus.blogspot.com/)
To: Petronski
Like it or lump it he is build converts. I went out shooting with 3 friends last weekend, we were sighting in out deer rifles. I got to talkign to them about the race adn I found out 2 were leaning to Paul. They are conservatives tired of the war and tired of Washington.
12
posted on
09/16/2007 9:01:55 AM PDT
by
Hydroshock
("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
To: NapkinUser
13
posted on
09/16/2007 9:02:37 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(dhimmicrats and the liberal media have .chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
To: NapkinUser
Where do were park our sanity before we board the train?
14
posted on
09/16/2007 9:03:18 AM PDT
by
elizabetty
(The job of POTUS is not about ideology alone; it is about COMPETENCE to do the job WELL.)
To: NapkinUser
He right now is in my number 2 spot, but I am keeping my eyes open.
15
posted on
09/16/2007 9:03:22 AM PDT
by
Hydroshock
("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
To: NapkinUser
Would that be on the tract to nowhere?
16
posted on
09/16/2007 9:03:55 AM PDT
by
mimaw
To: Hydroshock
Yesterday I went out shooting with 4 friends, we were sighting in ouf deer rifles. I got to talking to them about the race and I found out 3 were leaning to Fred. They are libertarians tired of the anti-war sissies and goldbugs.
17
posted on
09/16/2007 9:05:11 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Cleveland Indians: Pennant -9)
To: NapkinUser
Freedom and Liberty bump!!
18
posted on
09/16/2007 9:05:16 AM PDT
by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
To: cardinal4
Perot Part Deaux. Its funny how history repeats itself. Like Peort, Paul will allow a Clinton into the White House. Ron Paul is running in the republican primary while Ross Perot was an independent candidate in the general election. You mind explaining to me how exactly Paul allows Hillary Clinton to win?
19
posted on
09/16/2007 9:05:25 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
To: NapkinUser
The problem with electing Ron Paul as president is that we’d end up with liberal government. That’s because Paul’s conservative stances have zero chance of being passed by Congress, while his liberal views would be readily accepted by the powers-that-be in Washington.
This is all theoretical, of course, since Paul isn’t going to be elected. I do admire his backers’ enthusiasm, though. And it’s a real enthusiasm, not the cynical “I’m gonna show how progressive I am by supporting a black guy” enthusiasm of Obama’s backers.
20
posted on
09/16/2007 9:06:12 AM PDT
by
puroresu
(I haven't seen a cute Democrat girl since 1969, and Ted Kennedy killed her)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-336 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson