Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darnright
It’s your position, then, that a reasonable person would not conclude that large mastiff dogs, trained for attack by a convicted drug dealer, might pose a threat when handled by someone with no professional dog experience ?

Are you being intentionally dense or do you really not understand? It's my position that you don't need all all of the things you say to define a threat, that the specific breed alone is enough to define a threat.

102 posted on 09/14/2007 9:30:55 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: from occupied ga

>Are you being intentionally dense or do you really not understand? It’s my position that you don’t need all all of the things you say to define a threat, that the specific breed alone is enough to define a threat.<

When you have no answer to an argument, resorting to ad hominum attacks just cements that reality.

Any large dog presents some level of threat, especially if it’s with other dogs (that’s a pack for those of you in Rio Linda). That’s why experts recommend males be castrated at a young age, and that’s why communities have laws that forbid allowing any dog to roam at large.


106 posted on 09/14/2007 9:42:00 AM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson