Replies

“During the past legislative session, a bill that would have allowed fathers to present DNA evidence at any time proving that they are not the biological parent and shouldn’t be obligated to pay child support failed to come up for a final vote this year.”
This makes sense unless they have adopted the child having knowledge that the child was the biological child of another man. If they have that’s cruel to the kid.If the man and child had been under the illusion that they were father and child and not, the woman is fully to blame. I bet this has to do with women who are rape victims and then terrified to tell the truth. Still wrong to the man though. No way around that. Is that what this bill got hung up? Otherwise it’s a no brainer.
What about children borne out of the action of a rape? Who should pay then? The rapist if found and made to pay support, can he then say he should have visitation for that support? If a woman is ethically opposed to abortion and unprepared to support herself, taxpayers pay. Thats also why this bill probably got hung up. Legislators more often care about who will support inconvenient youth more than the truth.