Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
His evasiveness suggests strongly that he's guilty of impregnating this woman...

Ecxuse my lack of tact, but besides reinforcing the notion that you didn't read the article, you are reinforcing the idea that you are pretty stupid. The mother has named another guy as the father, and she's had a second child with him.

Just for giggles, why don't you explain how that scam would work?

124 posted on 09/17/2007 1:29:06 PM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops by accusing them of war crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: gogeo
Given the opportunity to provide EVIDENCE neither the husband nor his wife have done so.

It's pretty obvious you haven't read the article(s) about this couple in any meaningful sense.

It's not about you this time.

125 posted on 09/17/2007 1:32:20 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: gogeo
Try my post at 117. These two are into their game deep enough that they need DNA tests to demonstrate that what they are claiming is true.

So far, no DNA tests.

The only thing at stake is the welfare payment she seems to have asked for, but she's got a baby daddy and a husband (she claims) who can take care of this situation themselves without you and I paying for it.

Let me amend the thought "think welfare fraud" to "think about someone getting caught attempting welfare fraud".

126 posted on 09/17/2007 1:38:09 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson