Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1rudeboy; gondramB; editor-surveyor

So what happens if, after the appropriations bill becomes law without funding the Mexican trucks, the NAFTA arbitration panel awards damages against the US government? Suppose congress refuses to authorize money for the award?

My opinion is that congress should amend the NAFTA authorization law to put limits on what damages the US will honor. In this case, the panel could award damages even though Mexico has no legitimate and effective tracking of driver records, so allowing Mexican trucks in will endanger public safety and perhaps national security.

Also, I am not a lawyer, but perhaps there would be a way to challenge such an award in the courts on the grounds that the safety concerns outweigh any arbitration panel’s decision, although I don’t know exactly what legal arguments would be used.


755 posted on 09/14/2007 1:51:42 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Illegals: representation without taxation--Citizens: taxation without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

The United States’ twenty-year-old dispute with Canada over softwood lumber probably is the best example of how we are able to ignore NAFTA arbitration rulings.


758 posted on 09/15/2007 7:26:06 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 755 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson