The “agreement” is completely contrary to the provisions of our constitution that provide a method for making such agreements. There is no constitutional basis for enacting this statute.
>>The “agreement” is completely contrary to the provisions of our constitution that provide a method for making such agreements. There is no constitutional basis for enacting this statute.<<
Are you saying that you view all international agreements below the treaty level to be unconstituional?
Has there ever been a President or Supreme court who agreed with you?