[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

>> No “tribunal” can force the Congress to fund something. To state otherwise would imply that an extra-national panel has been granted power to appropriate money from our public purse. The US Supreme Court can’t order that either. Not from a legal - as in the Constitution - standpoint.

The question is, are we a Constitutional Republic still or not?<<

Good post, Infidel.

From Article 9 of the Constitution:

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;

Congress has explicit and sole power to spend, or not spend, money. Idiot judges do not, if the Constitution is still the law.

[Infidel1571]

“Congress has explicit and sole power to spend, or not spend, money. Idiot judges do not, if the Constitution is still the law.”

I guess we’ll see if that’s still true.... Here’s hoping that at least some of it is still followed.

[Paul Ross]

From Article 9 of the Constitution: No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;

Congress has explicit and sole power to spend, or not spend, money. Idiot judges do not, if the Constitution is still the law.

US Constitution Bump!