Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
I am under the impression that this is a treaty requirement.

NAFTA is not a TREATY. It is not the "Supreme Law of the Land". It merely was a Congressional authorization, which had no hope of passing as a treaty, hence Xlinton sneaked it through as an agreement, a mere Congressional enactment...which cannot supersede State law. Or impose an extra-Constitutional juridical requirement that trumps U.S. review, or Panels which can impose "fines" on the people of the United States for failing to let the de facto unregulated and unsafe Mexican vehicles roam across the borders and throughout our country...

All Congress needs to do to put this all to rest is simply revoke NAFTA by Majority Vote...and DEFUND the Executive Branch enablements of it.

649 posted on 09/12/2007 12:33:55 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross

Then let’s see Congress repeal the Agreement,not break in piece by piece.


676 posted on 09/12/2007 10:41:19 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

NAFTA is a law, that would require another law to overturn it.

Bush/Clinton brought us NAFTA, so don’t expect Bush/Clinton to repeal NAFTA.


745 posted on 09/13/2007 7:56:36 PM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson