Posted on 09/08/2007 7:27:08 AM PDT by marthemaria
ONCE again the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad (peace be upon him) has been degraded in yet another Danish cartoon. This time Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks targetted the noble Prophet in the most disgusting fashion.
The Swedish newspaper, Nerikes Allehanda, claims that they were just exercising their right to freedom of expression and refuses to apologise.
But freedom of expression does not mean that you insult the most beloved Prophet of Islam and slap the faces of over 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide. This latest insult is not freedom of expression. It is an all-out provocation.
The symbolism of the dog is a deliberate attempt to infuriate Muslims. The dog is considered an impure creature in Islam and is not even welcome in the Muslim home because angels are afraid of it and will not enter. Muslims really should blame themselves for the latest cartoon degradation. This is not the first time that the Prophet has been insulted in caricature. Denmark did it in September 2005. And the Muslim reaction was outrage and violent protests in several Islamic nations. Several Muslims died and were injured.
There was also a Middle East boycott of Danish goods that literally crippled the Danish industry in a matter of days. They lost millions if not billions in revenue. But the boycott only lasted for a few months.
Slowly, but surely, the Danish goods began to hit the shelves where they remain today. And Muslims are once again buying them and supporting a country that never even apologised for the insults. The message that Muslims as a whole sent was that our reaction is only temporary and proved that the Ummah is a 'soft-target'. The Swedes came out with their own cartoon because they do not fear the Muslim reaction. They know if we boycott them it will only be temporary and they will not lose much if anything. The Muslim world has proven to be weak in its hunger for consumer goods whereas we should be strong in boycotting companies that insult our Prophet and our religion.
Once the first boycott began it never should have ended. There are alternative to Danish, and Swedish, goods. Our enemies claim they have a right to 'express themselves'. That's fine. Muslims have the right to decide where to spend their money.
The enemies of Islam and Muslims continuously perpetrate the image that Muslims are uncivilised beasts. President Bush, himself, was recently quoted as saying, "The region would be dramatically transformed in a way that could imperil the civilised world."
The context of his statement was in terms of the US troops being pulled out of Iraq but Bush's sentiment is crystal clear; Muslims are uncivilised brutes. Just look at the violent protests and rampages that occurred after the last cartoons. I remember seeing one news report of a violent protest in Afghanistan where the flag of Denmark was burned. Muslims were shown on TV with angry faces, gaping mouths, and were videotaped destroying property.
The newscaster chimed in that the Muslim reaction was 'uncivilised' and 'destructive'. I firmly believe that Muslims had the right to be angry in 2005 as they do now.
But by engaging in unlawful and destructive protests Muslims really set themselves up for looking just like what our enemies call us, 'uncivilised'. It is utterly a self-fulfilling prophecy that all Muslims should be proactive in warding off.
The Muslim reaction over the latest cartoon slur against Muhammad (peace be upon him) should be firm and peaceful. There is no need for violence and it only makes us look bad in the global audience. Muslims should complain to the Swedish Embassy in their respective country and should most assuredly boycott Swedish goods unless a formal apology is received. Granted, the Swedish government will distance itself from the Nerikes Allehanda newspaper and say that they have no control over it and are not to blame. But the government itself must be held accountable. They control the licensing for the paper and could revoke it at their will.
If Muslims decided to unite and boycott Swedish goods it should not be a limited boycott like the Danish one was. It should be a permanent lifelong commitment to avoid all Swedish products. It should be something you teach your children to do and even your grandchildren.
It's easy for the enemies of Islam to insult our religion and our Prophet but it's even easier for us to not support them with our dirhams and dinars. The quickest way to bring any nation to its' knees is to hit them where it hurts...their wallet.
Sumayyah Meehan is a Kuwait-based American writer who embraced Islam. She can be reached at abidhjs@msn.com
I didn't know it ended. Whatever. In any case it was a good thing because it got me hooked on Carlsberg beer.
Thanks. If that poorly drawn sketch causes them to quiver, they really are a &$#@ed up “religion”.
“...uncivilized beasts.” That about covers it.
L
I'm in favor of dropping something "special" on top of one of their next mass demonstration (OutrageFest 2007).
Finally give these turds something valid to get huffed about.
Right on, BOP. Anything they can do, we can do better.
I am offended at this too. How dare anyone disrespect mans best friend by dressing him as a child molesting terrorist! That is just wrong.
I’m guessing I shouldn’t send them an invite to the unveiling when my NEA grant to sculpt the likeness of Mohammed out of a t*rd goes through?
The UN does not even have a problem with Saudi Arbia prohibiting Jews from entering that country.
To paraphrase my late father “ I wish I had two Korans, so I could sh!t on one and use the other to cover it up!”
The quickest way to bring any nation to its’ knees is to hit them where it hurts...their wallet. WUT? wut? In Aug 1945 the USA accomplished in a few days what many brave people had being toiling at for years.
Considering how good a judge of character most dogs are, it's not surprising that Mad Mo's demons don't get along with them
Nothing screams "provocation" like mass-murder. That is a human reaction, not opinion. For starters.
Freedom of expression means exactly that. What part of "freedom of expression" eludes the inferior primitive mind? There are no exceptions, short of violence to others or threats of violence to others. Although cartoons might one day qualify, I have not seen one to date.
Provocation to violence, short of violence itself, is a stupid argument. Period.
Muslim logic. If I live to be a thousand, I will never understand it.
What are the filthy rich hog-butts gonna do with their billions$? Invest or store them in Kosova?
I'll go you one better...
Newspapers too easily can be branded propaganda tools of a hostile state.
I propose a campaign to collect cartoons drawn by ordinary citizens world-wide and collecting them in an "islamic calendar."
One different cartoon for each day. In glorious color. In addition, one muslim historic atrocity for that date can be listed. There are enough of them for dozens of calendars.
I realize that there already are thousands of such cartoon in existence which are wildly appropriate, but a new batch would be refreshing.
Is there a printer somewhere who would be willing to print them at cost or at reasonable profit and allow (for obvious reasons) sales and distribution by someone else?
I would contribute at least one cartoon (still to be conceived and executed) myself.
Anyone else think this is a great idea?
Tell us how you really feel!
*snicker*
Too bad the Muslims forgot that a lot of their beliefs are based off of Jewish teachings.
Bin the Spin Laden has Jewish blood running through his veins.
Where can I get a copy of the cartoon. Maybe Larry Flint would be so kind as to publish it seeing he has an issue with religion?
Please enlighten us on that revelation
As far as I understand the only thing that is the same between the moon god cult of death called Islam and Judaism is the concept of a monotheistic God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.