I’m just pointing out that it’s the pot calling the kettle black in this instance.
And it doesn’t have to “support a constitutional process”. Anyway, the sites are ether one person one vote, in which case it’s whoever gets the most people on before it closes, or they allow more than one, in which case they really only want it for back patting purposes and it’s observationally worthless.
What are you looking for, McCain/Feingold for the Internet???
50% of American voters don’t vote at all because they lost faith in the integrity of the process long ago.
Half of the 50% who do vote and been actively involved in further corrupting the intergrity of that process and now you want to play devils advocate in defense of such efforts?
What DU rock did you slither out from under?