Posted on 09/06/2007 9:21:16 AM PDT by pissant
I found the debate frustrating. Neither of the top tier candidates -- Giuliani and Romney -- had a good night. Giuliani took a big hit early over his 1994 statement welcoming illegal immigrants to New York. Thereafter, he seemed to answer most questions by referring to New York city crime statistics. He needs to diversify
Romney seemed defensive and, at times, evasive. His answers on Iraq were rambling. When the deputy sheriff in the restaurant called him out for not articulating an "end game" strategy, Romney was unable, I thought, to take advantage of the opportunity.
McCain did pretty well. At a minimum, as always, he answered the questions. I can conceive of him having a "surge" in New Hampshire as the "straight talk" candidate, particularly if Giuliani and Romney don't step it up.
Huckabee had another decent night, and I give points to anyone who takes on Ron Paul. But (as Romney pointed out) the "broken pottery" analogy in Iraq misses the most important reason for why we need to keep fighting -- namely the implications of the outcome on the war against terror. Huckabee also totally ducked the final question concerning what we should do if Iran continues on its present course towards becoming a nuclear power.
Duncan Hunter was, once again, the best of the rest.
Sam Brownback continues to be a huge disappointment. If the best he can do is channel Tom Friedman, it's clearly time for him to withdraw.
UPDATE: For what it's worth, Fox's focus group agreed with me that McCain did better than the two front-runners, and that Rudy talked too much about New York.
Unfortunately, everyone with a brain thinks it will be a bloodbath, even some of those who support withdrawal. So not only does Bush, Romney, Rudy, Hunter, Huckster, Tancredo, etc etc believe it will be a catastrophe to withdraw, so do the Iraqis. Paul is a fool. He has no idea what he’s babbling about on this subject.
And here I thought he took his marching orders from the Constitution?....LOL Darn.
Yep, that statement might even be more outrageous than Rudy's top two.
Rudy isn’t the only candidate (or freeper) who does not have a problem with non-criminal illegal aliens.
Look for more discussions and questioning of candidates about proposed amnesty compromises that will differentiating between ‘criminal’ and ‘non-criminal’ illegal aliens and justification by the econobot supporters who’s candidates favor a path to citizenship.
“I don’t think he should be invited to any more Republican debates.” (Paul)
If they keep having these text message Polls we will never see the end of him!
Maybe after we leave they will keep fighting each other. Like they are now. I doubt they will unite and try to take us on again.
The operative words above are 'non-criminal' illegal aliens!!
BY DEFINITION, if they are here illegally,,,,they ARE breaking the law. If they are here illegally, there are NO 'non-criminal' illegal aliens.
Absolutely NOT.
Do some research and comparison and you’ll understand why paring Hunter with Thompson is like paring Thompson with Guiliani. Cerainly not a ticket that would get my support. Besides which, BOTH candidates have said they will NOT take VP positions.
I agree with you. I’m just saying that some candidates and freepers don’t.
The only screw up with the invasion of Iraq is that we decided to stick around. Our military and war plan was awesome. We should have left via Iran along time ago.
Your impressions don’t count. Adelman is the only one who said “cakewalk” unless you can PROVE otherwise.
I think you need to go back and read pre-war speeches, etc, and you’ll find your “impressions” are based on feelings not facts.
Pity you want people held accountable for your misguided feelings.
Some observations from last night’s debate;
Ron Paul is a certifiable loon and how any FReeper can support him with a straight face is way beyond me.
I like Tancredo, but there can be no doubt that he’s a one issue candidate.
Rudy is a blowhard and New Yorkers can have him back. We don’t want him here in the Midwest. Give him a job at Fox, maybe replacing Colmes. Hell, Hannity has him on every other night, that is, when he’s not talking to Al Sharpton.
Mitt’s middle name is RINO.
Huckabee doesn’t have a clue.
McCain blew it with his support of “immigration reform,” and he can talk all he wants about terrorists and the WOT, but he’ll soon dry up and blow away.
Was Brownback even there?
I was impressed with Hunter but he hardly got any questions.
And oh yes; Ron Paul is a certifiable loon.
Nah. :-) I got it right the first time. Fred has the face recognition now—4/8 years from now, Duncan would be known and could be the CIC then. :-)
Win/win.
Did you know he was (is still?) an obstetrician?
Makes you want to bang your head against a brick wall.
I’ve had the same response concerning communism, socialism, marxism, etc. in America!! Unbelievable.
Duncan Hunter had sincerety, knowledge and poise last night. He is the one fit and serious enough to take on all of our problems.
This must be why the MSM will not allow him much attention. They never ask him a full round of questions on all issues.
I don’t follow Adelman’s career. I presented information in a WaPo article HE HIMSELF authored.
He and/or the paper either made a mistake or your source is incorrect.
I didn’t pull this out of my butt like YOU are regarding your fweeeeelings about the lead up to war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.