To: mnehrling; Petronski; jveritas; wideawake; FreeReign
We were the aggressors? Did Ron Paul completely ignore the fact that Saddam violated the ceasefire (not to mention his humanitarian violations)? Or that he violated the UN Resolutions that were valid under international law (which Ron Paul says our war was illegal internationally...which is odd, because I’ve heard his supporters say he doesn’t care about international law)?
And his answer on a possible bloodbath should we live early is stupid. He just has to look at history (Vietnam). Then again, he didn’t think a bloodbath happened in Vietnam either.
676 posted on
09/05/2007 6:50:23 PM PDT by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
Huckabee’s “we broke Iraq” line was not a great answer.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
The funny part is that Paul ignores Article 1, Section 8, Subsection 10 gives congress the right to define and punish violations against the laws of nations.
713 posted on
09/05/2007 6:52:27 PM PDT by
mnehring
(See Ron Paul's Latest Commercial- http://youtube.com/watch?v=0p9NBi0DwQw)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Every time Paul opens his mouth concerning foreign policy the more I become convinced this man lacks the capability to be CinC.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
We were the aggressors? Did Ron Paul completely ignore the fact that Saddam violated the ceasefire (not to mention his humanitarian violations)? Or that he violated the UN
Resolutions that were valid under international law (which Ron Paul says our war was illegal internationally...which is odd, because Ive heard his supporters say he doesnt care about international law)? And his answer on a possible bloodbath should we live early is stupid. He just has to look at history (Vietnam). Then again, he didnt think a bloodbath happened in Vietnam either. Right you are, US007.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson