Posted on 09/04/2007 11:50:38 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
“but I have always been instinctively Conservative”
As all grownups who pay their own bills without help from Uncle Sam’s tax trough are...
EXACTLY!
Not if you’re an economic conservative/social liberal who supports Israel...
I doubt this, I think he relishes in the attention. If he really weren't proud of them, he wouldn't be associating himself with them and egging them on.. it is like his so called condemnation of 9.11Truthers(sic) who support him, yet he continues to frequent radio shows like Alex Jones whose purpose on air is to be a conspiracy theorist. If he really didn't want to be associated with them, he wouldn't associate himself with them. He has done a good job of disassociating himself with David Duke and Stormfront's support by completely ignoring them, why doesn't he do the same to the Truther conspiracy nuts? Because he is in league with the latter.
TRUTH ALERT!
Well said!
Do they prefer the term JFK democrat?
Yep...
Then why is it that the "neo-cons" are the same A-holes pushing for open borders and unfettered immigration?
If you believe Adolf Hitler should not have been stopped in the 1930’s...
If you believe Communists should have been allowed to take over not only all of Eastern Europe and Asia, but South America and pretty much the rest of the world, too...
...you’re not a “neo-con.”
And Pauls folks fall under none of them...
And then we have another dilemma. If the number of emails Mr. Williams is getting is overwhelming him surely as Mr. Williams and others have claimed Dr. Paul's support to be false, this onslaught can only be coming from a few internet 'spammers'....otherwise there may be more supporters than Mr. Williams and others have claimed. Because then we'd have a real problem for the media darlings and talking heads wouldn't we...
Liberals accuse anyone who believes that the American ideal can make the world better as being a Neo-Con.
Very Old School Conservatives and Libertarians accuse anyone who doesn’t believe in goldbuggery and isolationism a Neo-Con.
New School Conservatives accuse any RINO or someone associated with Colon Powell, James Baker, or Ed Meese a Neo-Con.
John Bircher Libertarians accuse anyone who has ever stepped foot in, walked past, or even read a publication by the CFR a Neo-Con.
Exactly. I frequently give links and quotes to Paulistinians who always either try to divert the attention, or make excuses for why he goes on the Alex Jones show (example: nobody else is inviting him on talk shows).
Going on the Alex Jones show is political suicide. The only reason it has not hurt Ron Paul, is
1) actual support for Ron Paul is insignificant
2) Paulistinians are as wacked out as is Ron Paul.
Well put.
Well put.
“On many domestic issues there is almost no difference between the people you describe as neo-communists and the ones I describe as “neo-conservatives.” They are both adamantly opposed to private ownership of guns, they are both hard-core supporters of open borders, and both groups are openly hostile to anything remotely resembling a strict constructionist interpretation of the U.S. constitution.”
Perhaps we differ in who is a “neocon”. I would characterize William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz and Karl Rove as neocons. I don’t recall any of them as being opposed to gun ownership or strict constructionism.
Damn, there you go again, hitting their truth with the facts...
Gotta hate that...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.