Skip to comments.
Paul's supporters disappointed by results
Dallas Morning News ^
| September 2, 2007
| GROMER JEFFERS Jr.
Posted on 09/02/2007 3:41:26 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 221 next last
To: bray
Perhaps. Ron Paul is more dangerous.
81
posted on
09/02/2007 6:22:12 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Ron Paul is a Libertarian. And he's got some good ideas.
He's also a bit of a nut. And he's got some nutty ideas. Like about the War on Terror.
The former doesn't disqualify him to be President.
The latter does.
82
posted on
09/02/2007 6:24:29 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I have no desire to bash Paul.
I’m more interesting in pointing out that Duncan Hunter won. Hunter is definitely the best candidate in the race.
83
posted on
09/02/2007 6:24:52 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: bray
Maybe Ron Paul’s slogan could be “Harm America, not al Qaeda.” Or “Don’t interfere with al Qaeda’s sphere of influence.” Or “Al Qaeda: They’ve got grievances we should recognize.” Or “I’ll represent, Texas, America, and al Qaeda.” Or “Dump Israel. Who needs strategic allies when you can butter up to al Qaeda?” Or “Stop the Mexicans first. Al Qaeda won’t pick our tomatoes.”
84
posted on
09/02/2007 6:27:12 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: DoughtyOne
I would hope that this forums participants could be more mature than those in 2000 were. Don't hold your breath. I will be voting for Congressman Paul in the primaries, regardless of any and all insults thrown my way between now and then. Naturally; these same people will expect me to cast my vote for the eventual GOP nominee next November, and when they don't get it; will weep and wail as they watch Hillary Clinton take the oath of office in January of 2009. Treating people and their candidate like crap WILL come back to bite you in the behind...think about it.
85
posted on
09/02/2007 6:28:00 PM PDT
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: who knows what evil?
Yeah, that’s the spirit. If we cannot have Ron Paul, then let them have Hillary. No wonder we don’t take the efforts of the Ron Paul types trying to take over the Republican Party and this forum very serious. You’re not so much conservatives as you are Libertarians, and not getting your way, and wounded pride will be your excuse for helping Hillary. We all knew this any way, so it’s no surprise.
86
posted on
09/02/2007 6:30:58 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: who knows what evil?
Feeling hurt?
Silly me. Here I am thinking Ron Paul fanatics might — on the slim chance I admit, actually care about this country. They obviously care more about how they are treated by people they have never met and only exist in their world when they click on the internet.
My bad.
To: bray
Most of us enjoy these threads for comic relief and you never disappoint. Trashing a devout Christian who wants to restore Constitutional principles again isn't my idea of comic relief. More like desperation disguised as black humor.
Have you decided who your going to support after he gets his 3%
A more important question. Do you think the GOP nominee will need the thousands of grassroots supporters that are now supporting Paul in the general?
To: elhombrelibre
Now, Wisconsin has a long history of backing kooks on both sides of the political spectrum. Yeah, that's why conservative Tommy Thompson won four terms here.
More talking out of your ass as usual.
To: xzins
Reading from the invitation to Texas Straw Poll, the only one’s voting were “previous Convention Deligates”. Ron Paul could bus in half the state as supporters, BUT they probably were not Straw Poll vote elegible.
90
posted on
09/02/2007 6:50:21 PM PDT
by
dusttoyou
(FredHead from the git go)
To: who knows what evil?
Treating people and their candidate like crap WILL come back to bite you in the behind...think about it. The GOP has been doing this to Paul since his first Congressional race. They've always backed the RINO running against him, or in some cases, the Democrat.
I wouldn't support Paul if he ran as an independent or 3rd party candidate. But I can hardly blame him if he does.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Well it is a good reason to post it...
Still love the bit from the Fred Thread...
92
posted on
09/02/2007 6:58:34 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: West Coast Conservative
They may be disappointed, but only a fool would be surprised.
To: West Coast Conservative
You made the meeting then?
Can you forward me your notes...
94
posted on
09/02/2007 7:02:38 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
This is the brand Fred-a-holics prefer
![](http://www.jelsert.com/images/products/main_flavoraid.jpg)
95
posted on
09/02/2007 7:03:35 PM PDT
by
Abcdefg
To: bill1952
Where does you cat stand on the WOT and Immigration, and how old is it, in human years of course. There is a standard to meet..
96
posted on
09/02/2007 7:06:11 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: fieldmarshaldj
"Its too bad the supposed most Constitutional candidate believes the document to be a mutual suicide pact." I see a lot of Freepers have no use for the U.S. Constitution anymore.
97
posted on
09/02/2007 7:06:55 PM PDT
by
Abcdefg
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Seriously, all kidding aside, with where things are right now, shouldn’t that be enough.
98
posted on
09/02/2007 7:08:58 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; All
Including his love for Shrimp subsidies.. There is nothing in the Constitution about subsidies..
99
posted on
09/02/2007 7:10:35 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: Abcdefg
It's not the Constitution that is the problem, but the bizarre interpretation of it that certain individuals come up with. ;-)
100
posted on
09/02/2007 7:14:07 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 221 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson