Skip to comments.
Paul's supporters disappointed by results
Dallas Morning News ^
| September 2, 2007
| GROMER JEFFERS Jr.
Posted on 09/02/2007 3:41:26 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 221 next last
To: DoughtyOne
If I were you, I wouldn’t respond either.
To: Abcdefg
That’s great.
I think everyone should be voting “for” someone instead of “against” anyone else.
To: elhombrelibre
No wonder we dont take the efforts of the Ron Paul types trying to take over the Republican Party and this forum very serious. Youre not so much conservatives as you are Libertarians, and not getting your way, and wounded pride will be your excuse for helping Hillary. We all knew this any way, so its no surprise. Who the hell is "we"? Trying to take over, my ass...I've been posting on this forum for ten years.
143
posted on
09/02/2007 8:38:48 PM PDT
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: soccermom
Boy, that is funny. I am in tears here. And I'm slapping my knee too.
Not.
To: Lovebloggers
Feeling hurt? Hurt? About what? I am only suggesting that the immature behavior around here is going to alienate a lot of potential voters come next November.
145
posted on
09/02/2007 8:40:36 PM PDT
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
He left the party to run in another party! He did not stay and fight, he did what was best for him politically! He came back when it was best for him politically. Being right on the issues is important, but loyalty is also important to me.
You are free to support him all you like but I don’t have to support him nor should I have to listen to his supporters laugh about 9/11. They should have been outside with Cindy!
To: hinckley buzzard
There would still be a State Department under Paul, and you can bet that it won’t be filled with leftover liberals from the Clinton administration under a Paul administration. I’m pretty sure they’d negotiate in good faith and keep America’s POV first. As far as answering your questions, no we shouldn’t withdraw immediately but yet we shouldn’t remain there for years, probably decades with permanent bases. We don’t have the money.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
EEE, a few nutjobs IS his whole base of support.
148
posted on
09/02/2007 8:47:38 PM PDT
by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: who knows what evil?
Oh really, your screen name shows you as getting here in 1999. Was it a Libertarian site then, ten years ago in 1999?
149
posted on
09/02/2007 8:48:07 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: sugarbabe
Yeah, let's talk about loyalty. The GOP establishment has always tried to undercut Paul in every one of his Congressional races, even supporting the Dim candidate against him.
So what if Paul ran as a Libertarian in 1988. BFD
To: DoughtyOne
As a person who didnt vote for Bush in 2000, I know what you mean. I voted 'against Gore' in 2000, but I gave up on that 'lesser than two evils' BS in 2004, and voted Peroutka. I am not supporting 'business as usual' in 2008, either. As far as the GOP goes; no conservative candidate, no vote.
151
posted on
09/02/2007 8:49:41 PM PDT
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: Abcdefg
I have lived here a long time, I know his history. He was once my congressman and left to run for the senate. He then ran for President as a Libertarian, and that is when I stopped supporting him. He then came back to the Republican party so he could be reelected to Congress. I guess you could say I have a long memory. I agree with him on many issues, but I cannot get past how he deserted the Republican party when he did not like the presidential candidate. I will not be surprised if he does the same thing again. Someone should ask him if he will support the party nominee if he does not win the nomination?
To: OCCASparky
EEE, a few nutjobs IS his whole base of support. Sure, sure. Those thousands of folks campaigning for Paul on their own money and time, they must be some crazy muthafos then.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Just supporting him is a good sign of poor cognitive skills.
155
posted on
09/02/2007 8:52:31 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: sugarbabe
I will not be surprised if he does the same thing again. Someone should ask him if he will support the party nominee if he does not win the nomination? He promised his wife that he won't run 3rd party or independent.
But don't look for any endorsements. Why should he help the GOP after the grief he's gotten from them?
To: elhombrelibre
Was it a Libertarian site then, ten years ago in 1999? Ask yourself...you were here then.
157
posted on
09/02/2007 8:54:19 PM PDT
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I’m curious.
Ron Paul hasn’t taken ANY earmarks during his term in Congress, right?
I thought I had read awhile back that Ron Paul would ask for funds for his pet projects and then vote against them. Nice trick if that’s what happened. But, as long as he actually refused the earmark money, I’ll have a different thought on it all.
But, if he actually accepted ANY earmarks.....I dunno.....
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Thousands--in a nation of HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS.
Hell, even 10 percent of adults think Elvis is still alive. You're even more marginalized than that.
159
posted on
09/02/2007 8:55:10 PM PDT
by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Why should he help the GOP after the grief he's gotten from them?
Because without the GOP, he'd be asking, "Do you want fries with that order?"
And the GOP hasn't supported a candidate in his district other than L. Ron since 1998, so do us a favor and put away the paranoia card, m'kay?
160
posted on
09/02/2007 8:56:39 PM PDT
by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 221 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson