Posted on 09/02/2007 11:05:33 AM PDT by Kaput
Alger Hiss, Academic Vampire by: Malcolm A. Kline, August 28, 2007
The liberal cadres that defended him for decades have thinned since career diplomat Alger Hiss was convicted of perjuring himself against accusations that he spied for the Soviet Union. In large part, this turnaround stems from mounting evidence of his guilt as can be seen in:
Declassified congressional hearings originally held in executive session;
Federal agency reports once classified that were unsealed when they hit 50 years of age; and
Communist International and KGB files in the Soviet Union and its former satellite nations opened to the West when the Cold War ended.
Virtually alone, many academics remain unconvinced. Just about everybody accepts that Hiss was guilty of espionage, but a dwindling band of radicals still clings to the fantasy of his innocence, John J. Miller writes in the August 27th issue of National Review. Earlier this year, Kai Bird and Svetlana Chervonnaya argued at a New York University conference that Hiss was not a spythey identified another figure, who previously had escaped suspicion, as the real traitors.
Their claims, accepted only by die-hard Hiss partisans, also appear in the summer issue of American Scholar. Unfortunately, it is to such folk that we entrust our history.
Malcolm A. Kline is the executive director of Accuracy in Academia.
If you would like to comment on this article, please e-mail mal.kline@academia.org
Kai Bird has made a career out of defending communists, lying about it, denying that that communists were ever at work in America, lying about it, defending illegal immigration, lying about it, and opposing the war, lying about it. He is a former editor of The Nation {surprise!}, so you can just imagine his world-view. I would not believe word this guy says or writes.
This Just In: Pete Seeger Denounced Stalin Over a Decade Ago
The thing that really must bug these apologists is that Nixon is the one who brought Hiss down.
Only the NYT could have a story like this yesterday and not realize the irony.
This Just In: Pete Seeger Denounced Stalin Over a Decade Ago
///////////////////
Actually, this is a change of religious cannon. That is if you accept that certain doctrines of the old left had the weight of religious orthodoxy.
If an old line stalinist denounces stalin then its possible to accept McCarthy as being correct
Yes.
You can't understand Watergate unless you understand what went before...all the way back to Hiss.
Alger Hiss helped write the charter for the un.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.