To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Age of Reason; 3AngelaD
A vote for Clinton....Gore ......was a vote for this.... Good point.
But I was thinking of 40+ years ago, when they changed the immigration laws to open the floodgates of people.
However, most of those who voted for Gore live in densely populated areas.
And they will want us to live like that also, because it's more energy and resource efficient.
And to experience the "wonder" of all those people, we need to live efficiently or we won't have any energy and resources left to share with them.
To: Age of Reason
But I was thinking of 40+ years ago, when they changed the immigration laws to open the floodgates of people.
Forty-two years ago, a fresh-faced Senator Edward Kennedy stated, " Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually." Cities in Iowa, which is not a border state, have gone from eighty percent white, native born to seventy percent Hispanic, mostly illegal since then. Are New Englanders just retarded in reelecting such a putz? Answer: probably, in support of your overall point.
Prior to 1965, the United States spoke of immigration control, not immigration reform. We live in a culture of misnomers and contradictions.
129 posted on
09/02/2007 11:18:14 PM PDT by
governmentstillsucks
("The whole idea is a continuum of [health] care, basically from birth to death."--John Edwards.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson