Skip to comments.
Congressman Bullies Constituents in Colorado Springs
Denver Post ^
| Sept 2, 2007
| Erin Emery
Posted on 09/02/2007 9:37:47 AM PDT by jebanks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: george76
Thanks, I would have missed this.
It is too bad this seems to have gotten out of hand. I do not know which side is correct but I do know it is hard to ever trust the Denver Post to report anything with unbiasted reporting or comments.
From what it appears, the initial issue does not seem that major to me.
To: goldstategop
Very hard to prove defamation of a public official.
22
posted on
09/03/2007 7:44:41 AM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Republican DOES NOT equal Conservative!)
To: Morgan in Denver
Looks like the Denver Post and Jeff Crank have joined up ?
23
posted on
09/03/2007 8:21:18 AM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: goldstategop
Already posted:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1890523/posts
I read that Jeff Crank is challenging Lamborn in the primary. I remember that Crank was supported by the Team Amercia PAC in 2006, which reflects well on him. Is Crank given any chance of winning the rematch?
24
posted on
09/03/2007 11:55:38 AM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
To: jebanks
Misleading title. He responded to their complaints, but I don’t see any threats. I smell a RAT.
To: jebanks
article: "Federal records show that Lamborn received a $1,000 check Jan. 30, 2007, from the IGT PAC. Records also show receipt of $500 from Murphy last summer. Lamborn said he has returned both contributions, but he could not say when that was done. Nancy Brown, a spokeswoman for Jones Vargas, a law firm in Reno, Nev., that represents IGT, said the company's PAC sent a $1,000 contribution to Lamborn in January. She said Lamborn returned the check, although she could not provide the date of the return. Federal records do not show that the check was returned."
So, no record that the check was returned after eight months. Maybe in the next day or so, they'll discover it really was returned.
26
posted on
09/03/2007 1:36:45 PM PDT
by
George W. Bush
("I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important.")
To: XeniaSt
Is Lamborn an elder?
DEUT 19:15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
There are 2 witnesses.
27
posted on
09/03/2007 1:57:17 PM PDT
by
jwh_Denver
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k08yxu57NA&NR=1 Paul Potts)
To: jwh_Denver
Is Lamborn an elder? DEUT 19:15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
There are 2 witnesses.
I'm sorry there is but one married couple, that counts as one. Rav Shaul commends Timothy to have followers of Yah'shua,
to speak to the brother one on one as Doug did first before going public.
shalom b'shem Yah'shua
28
posted on
09/03/2007 2:16:46 PM PDT
by
Uri’el-2012
(you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
To: XeniaSt
“I’m sorry there is but one married couple, that counts as one.”
Scripture?
29
posted on
09/03/2007 2:23:30 PM PDT
by
jwh_Denver
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k08yxu57NA&NR=1 Paul Potts)
To: jwh_Denver
NAU Genesis 2:24 For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.
30
posted on
09/03/2007 3:26:08 PM PDT
by
Uri’el-2012
(you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
To: XeniaSt
Thank you for clearing it up.
The MSM tries the ol’ divide-and-conquer routine, and succeeds, thanks to self-interested people.
31
posted on
09/03/2007 3:26:18 PM PDT
by
WOSG
( Don't tell me what you are against, tell me what you are FOR.)
To: XeniaSt
I don't buy that that verse applies in this situation at all. It doesn't make sense that a married couple would not pass the 2 witnesses test.
32
posted on
09/03/2007 3:45:10 PM PDT
by
jwh_Denver
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k08yxu57NA&NR=1 Paul Potts)
To: XeniaSt
So you’re saying under OT if the husband commits a crime worthy of death then his wife should be put to death also? Hey they’re one flesh. That’s nuts.
33
posted on
09/03/2007 4:06:44 PM PDT
by
jwh_Denver
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k08yxu57NA&NR=1 Paul Potts)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson