Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

Is that really true? I thought no one could be VP who was not eligible to serve as president, as he would not be.


16 posted on 08/31/2007 7:23:39 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: twigs; doug from upland

I’m series, this is hugh! This is the Eleanor Roosevelt scenario, yes?


20 posted on 08/31/2007 7:25:09 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: twigs
Is that really true? I thought no one could be VP who was not eligible to serve as president, as he would not be.

eligible to SERVE as president or eligible to be ELECTED president? there's a big difference.
39 posted on 08/31/2007 7:45:55 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (stop repeat offenders- don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: twigs

Bill could have succeeded to the presidency from someone ele’s term if he served no more than two years. He could then be elected twice for his own terms.

For the reverse, he has served two terms. If he became VP with less than two years remaining, the case should be able to made that he could indeed serve that additional time. Now, would Hillary want him to be the VP when he had some incentive to desire getting to the top spot again?


58 posted on 08/31/2007 8:05:26 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson