Skip to comments.
Who Would The World Elect for the President of the United States? [internet poll]
Whowouldtheworldelect ^
| 8-30-07
Posted on 08/30/2007 12:23:56 PM PDT by SJackson
Who Would The World Elect for
the President of the United States?
YOUR VOTE
You live in
Country was estimated by using your IP
Click on the candidate you would vote for:
Barack Obama
Total Votes:10,968
Bill Richardson
Total Votes:261
Chris Dodd
Total Votes:63
Dennis Kucinich
Total Votes:2,481
Hillary Clinton
Total Votes:2,173
Joe Biden
Total Votes:184
John Edwards
Total Votes:712
Mike Gravel
Total Votes:1,462
Votes for the Democratic party: 18,304
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cookiemassacre; paulestinians; paulfrcampaign; ronpaul; spambots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
1
posted on
08/30/2007 12:23:57 PM PDT
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
2
posted on
08/30/2007 12:25:00 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: SJackson
That’s a lot of cookies being deleted. lol.
To: SJackson
Who cares? The world doesn’t get to elect our President.
4
posted on
08/30/2007 12:26:00 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: SJackson
Thankfully, the world does not elect the American President. If they did we would have a President Kerry now and a President Paul in 2008.
5
posted on
08/30/2007 12:26:31 PM PDT
by
West Coast Conservative
(Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
To: SJackson; Allegra
Looks like Ron Paul walks away with the UN vote.
6
posted on
08/30/2007 12:26:41 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: wideawake
All the more reason not to nominate Ron Paul.
7
posted on
08/30/2007 12:32:03 PM PDT
by
roballen
To: SJackson
IF the election were held today and the world could elect a President for us, it looks like Ron Paul would be their choice.
I'm actually a little surprised. I would have thought Hillary would have done much better than she did, against Obamamama.
8
posted on
08/30/2007 12:32:51 PM PDT
by
NRA2BFree
("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
To: SJackson
To: West Coast Conservative
Followed by a President Ahmadinejad in 2012.
10
posted on
08/30/2007 12:33:37 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: SJackson
The correct answer is “Who gives a !@($)#$?”
11
posted on
08/30/2007 12:33:53 PM PDT
by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: roballen
To: SJackson
Sounds like there’s been some vote spamming. I doubt that many internationals know enough about Barak obama for those votes to be meaningful
13
posted on
08/30/2007 12:35:55 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
To: NRA2BFree
“IF the election were held today and the world could elect a President for us, it looks like Ron Paul would be their choice.”
Still more proof as to the worthlessness of world opinion.
14
posted on
08/30/2007 12:36:00 PM PDT
by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
To: domenad
15
posted on
08/30/2007 12:36:02 PM PDT
by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do it, but we're gonna getcha)
To: NRA2BFree
With 1.2 billion Mooselimbs in the world? With a name like Obama, if the world voted, he’d be a shoe in.
16
posted on
08/30/2007 12:36:13 PM PDT
by
mountn man
(The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
To: wideawake
LOL, now for the endorsements of NK, Iran, Chavez and Castro!
To: SJackson
I imagine that it would be the Antichrist.
18
posted on
08/30/2007 12:37:48 PM PDT
by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: NRA2BFree; wideawake
IF the election were held today and the world could elect a President for us, it looks like Ron Paul would be their choice....I'm actually a little surprised. I would have thought Hillary would have done much better than she did, against Obamamama. They spam even this poll, Paul has over 12,000 US votes, Obama 6,700, of a total 35,000 or so.
Why would a candidate want to win this poll? If you look at the country votes though, it's Paul and Obama top most of them.
19
posted on
08/30/2007 12:42:45 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: gondramB
Sounds like there’s been some vote spamming Please provide proof. I have never seen any proof. Heck, even Little Green Footballs for their poll found no evidence that Paul supporters voted twice. Their main charge (again without any proof) was that Paul's campaign passed the word and informed supporters about polls. Even if true, btw, FR does this all the time.
The complaints about spammers come from people who are sore losers. Why can't they be man enough to admit that they were beaten?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
