Posted on 08/29/2007 2:20:19 PM PDT by neverdem
Hillary Clinton is right to warn that a new terrorist attack on the US would help Republicans. Fear and trumped-up threats can be used to gain power.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is getting a pounding, from liberal blogs and her Democratic rivals for the presidency, because she had the temerity to warn voters that a possible terrorist attack before the election might strengthen the Republicans' hand. Chris Dodd called the comment "tasteless" and liberal bloggers are savaging her for, in their view, caving to the Republican framing of the terror issue.
These critics are being extraordinarily historically naive. If all Clinton meant was that a genuine terror attack would empower Republicans, then under the current social consensus, her comment is in poor taste. (Though this notion, that examining the possible domestic fallout of terror attacks is vulgar or unpatriotic, is one of those quasi-Victorian conventions that does not serve the vigorous debate needed in a time of crisis). But if Clinton is also trying to warn voters about something even more difficult for us to talk about, then she is absolutely right, even brave, and her critics are frighteningly ill-informed about the past.
Clinton is right to caution voters to consider the domestic outcome of a possible terror-related event before the election if you factor into her caution this forbidden subtext: if the terror scare in question is exaggerated, or even manufactured, to serve a domestic political purpose.
Even as I write those words, I understand I am breaching a major social taboo. There is a general polite consensus right now that maintains two no-debate areas. Firstly, you are not, if you are a...
--snip--
While General Eisenhower did not participate in senator Joe McCarthy's red-baiting directly leading up to the 1952 election, he did not repudiate the tactics.
(Excerpt) Read more at commentisfree.guardian.co.uk ...
IIRC, a poll said more than 30 percent of folks believe that the administration either was aware of the impending attack on September 11, 2001, or that they caused it. Another attack on our soil will probably generate a similar result.
IMO, Hitlery is a Liberal terrorist threat.
I think she was telling the Arabs to NOT do another attack till after the election if they wanted a friend in office.
Meadow Muffin
“Hillary Clinton is right to warn that a new terrorist attack on the US would help Republicans.”
That’s a no-brainer, with the Democrats all but rolling out the red carpet for terrorists while they hide under their beds and chant ‘make it go away’. A dose of reality would really hurt.
This little scare mongering tart can churn out a manufactured pant load with the best of fantasy writers.
We should fear American politics because they might scare us and have scared us but only Mrs billy Clinton has had the courage to speak to such matters.
We avert our eyes to the criminality of the Republican administration because she has it as fact it has been done and is being done—just ask any of her communist sources and their squelchers of freedom under the justification that Bush is such a mass manipulator.
Is it true Karl Rove is now working for Mrs Bill Clinton? Be very afraid.
Cuff her and stuff her.
Any set of circumstances that ends up in Herself, the Cold and Joyless, getting hammered by a significant part of her base, may only be termed most fortuitous for the rest of the world. That alone may not be enough to deny Herself the coronation as candidate she so desperately wants, but it certainly supplies ammunition that may be used in the general election.
There is a certain body of opinion out there, that sincerely believes, without a scintilla of proof, that the Bush Administration actively encouraged, aided and abetted the destruction from the events of September 11, 2001. Once this mindset is established, it is only a small leap to believe that another such catastrophe of similar proportions may already be in the later stages of planning and execution is imminent. And that the Bush Administration is also involved somehow in this new event.
Sorry for the conspiracy theory nutroots out there, but that same logic can be applied just as convincingly to whatever it is that Herself is doing. In a convoluted, double-double cross, reverse psychology sort of projected motives, that would work in a perverse way to then HELP Herself.
Any journalist worth his weight would ask the question “Why is that?” Perhaps it is because the demoncraps have been a roadblock to the war on terror. They have given comfort and aid to the terrorist. They have made it more and more difficult for law enforcement and intelligence agencies interdict terrorist. they have caused many American deaths by encouraging the terrorist. And the blood of those killed in the next terrorist attack will also be on the demoncraps hands. The dems can use their buddies in the lamestream media to cover for them, but the vast majority of Americans know they can not trust dems with the nations security. And any future attack will only serve to prove that. We have not had a successful attack in the US since 9/11, in spite all the dems have done to allow one to happen. If we get hit hard and it turns out that had any of the programs the dems put a stop to could have prevented it, they better hide cause I think there might be a lynching.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1887879/posts
The video of Jackie Mason commenting on this is an absolute hoot and right on the money.
What scares me is that no matter how much harm the Democrats do to our country, the MSM will be there to conceal, confuse and distort the truth. If A Dem is our next president, every failing in the economy, in national security and the environment will be blamed on Bush (take your pick), Reagan, Nixon or Eisenhower. With every defeat of a Dem, the MSM moves further and further to the left and away from reality.
Thanks for the link.
You mean, of course, 9/11 happened because of the Clinton administration. They sure could use force against their own citizens; but when it came to foriegn countries; let’s be friends as long as the money keeps pouring in.
Also too bad kennedys plane crashed, he may have got in her way in 2008 . Of course just more conspiracy BS .
I have a different view entirely, in my opinion what you said is actually true of Hillary. She was acting very strange the day of the attacks, like she already knew. I find these people fascinating, they always manage to accuse innocents of what they are actually guilty of, and their stupid supporters of course buy it hook line and sinker. It sucks that these people get to call themselves United States Citizens, because in spirit, they are traitors, every last one of them.
her comment is in poor taste.
As is the rest of her! Take out the trash, America!
We need a bumper sticker with hillary’s face on it and the circle with a slash through it and underneath it says
“JUST SAY NO TO ANOTHER CLINTON PRESIDENCY”
I’m so glad to read that I’m not the only one who took what Hillary said the same way as you did, that is the exact feeling I got to when she was talking, she seemed so desperate in her plea, it was if she was begging them, “Please don’t do it before I get elected, it will screw everything up, then the Republicans will get elected and I won’t get to enact the executive order that I wrote during my husband’s term in office, I was planning to divide the country into 10 sections and declare a national emergency and confiscate people’s property and relocate people, all in the name of national security!!!!!
Hey Fidel, Do me a favor and STFU! Also, if it isn't too much trouble, use whatever influence you have with everyone else around the world, that longs to see the USA weakened, to STFU too.
You're all making this more difficult when I have to act like I actually give a shit about... Well you know.
Thanks in advance,
Hill & Bill
Bingo!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.