You’re not alone. Heck, I’ve tried taking the easy way out before, only to have the problem arise blown much out of proportion than it was initially.
I want Craig to have the opportunity to face the accusing officer, and the Idaho paper that reportedly found that accuser ought be forced to reveal his name and Craig ought have an opportunity to confront those who accuse him. If the paper can’t or won’t, he should sue the living turd out of them.
I want to hear the officer’s perspective and especially if the officer first initiated the “contact”. I’d also like to know more about the “officer’s” background, political persuasion, sexual orientation, etc. before crucifying Craig.
Personally, I’m fed up with this crap of “he said, she said” and those accused are left no recourse for their defense while the MSM destroys their life by heaping allegations upon allegations.
Thank you. As I said earlier, I feel like post #51.