Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
Wars are not always fought between nations. We had one of those on our soil about 150 years ago.

How soon we forget!

And let's not forget, as much as we'd like to, the wars fought against the various Indian tribes in the 19th Century.

Still, each war had but two sides and two ultimate commanders. Lee surrendered to Grant at Appomattox. Crazy Horse, after routing Custer's 7th Cavalry, eventually was forced to surrender.

Who, in this "War on Terror," will be designated to surrender for the terrorists, and, assuming the American military commander in the Middle East is empowered to accept such a surrender, how will the thousands of terrorists be identified, rounded up and imprisoned?

Yes, there could be trials for war crimes. But historically, only the higher-ups are put on trial. The troops are given amnesty.

No doubt there are entire sections of the Pentagon already making plans for such things, just in case.

They'll continue making plans for the next century if present policies remain in effect.

337 posted on 08/29/2007 8:03:21 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: logician2u
I saw a book once called "Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace". I don't remember much about it, but I think Bush's handlers have come up with a near perfect sales pitch. Imagine that, fighting a war against a tactic.

As you indicate, this thing may never be over

338 posted on 08/29/2007 8:10:21 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson