Usually I bring this up when Paul supporters rant about the unconstitutional income tax, but a 70% budget reduction works too.
You support the income tax, I understand that.
Do you support social security? Tax and benefits, Paul supporters give me different answers on that issue.
For what is essentially junior high analysis, wikipedia will suffice.
Show me your 70% reduction, and yes, throwing grandma off the train is fine.
For Paul supporters, explain your support for the unconstitutional income tax, social security too if you're opposed.
Ron Paul's supporters bring new meaning to sophmoric.
blockquote>
Estimated receipts for fiscal year 2006 are $2.2 trillion. This expected income is broken down by the following sources:
The President's budget for 2006 totals $2.6 trillion. This budget request is broken down by the following expenditures:
And yes, I acknowledge RP votes NO,NO, NO on all kinds of stuff.
Will you acknowledge his votes are, well, irrelevant.
Being on the losing side of a vote is not quite the same as losing a fortune in the stock market. Congress changes, attitudes change, and eventually lost causes become winning causes.
Case in point: airline deregulation. Nobody would have bet a nickel 40 years ago that the CAB would go out of existence. It happened, and a Democrat president even ushered it in (surprise, surprise!).