Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PlainOleAmerican
Perhaps the “real Conservative” Paul might explain to us Limited Government Conservative his support for “earmarks as a necessary tool of Congress”?

Paul is just a con man. A demagogue who pushes the emotional hot buttons of the fringes.

290 posted on 08/29/2007 4:43:26 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Donate to Vets For Freedom! http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie
. . “earmarks as a necessary tool of Congress”?

You would rather the bureaucracy decided where our money is spent, right Johnnie?

Earmarks, as distasteful as they may be when it's pork that's being dispensed to a Congressman's chums, are at least (now) a matter of public record. Congressional Record, as well as the votes in committee, are available for all to see.

Ron Paul is the only member of Congress who consistently votes "NO" on bills which conflict with limits set by the United States Consitution as to the federal governement's powers and responsibilities. While other Republicans like to call themselves fiscal conservatives as they continue to vote increased funding for pet projects such as Alaska's notorious "bridge to nowhere," Rep. Paul has demonstrated a tenacious adherence to the Constitution he swore an oath to uphold and defend.

Eliminate a few federal departments and reduce the federal budget by, say, 70 percent, and earmarks take on a new insignificance.

300 posted on 08/29/2007 5:00:10 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson