All sniping of Craig aside (I definitely think he was trying to do something), shouldn’t someone have to do more than hand/foot signals under a stall to be arrested for lewd conduct? I’m all for getting rid of perverts, but doesn’t there have to be some kind of agreement, like an exchange of money or a verbal commitment, or engagement in some kind of sexual behavior? Shouldn’t the officer have been recording the exchange?
This whole setup seems unfair to me. Either plea to a lesser charge or take the chance of winding up on sex offender list for the rest of your life?
How easy would it be for a dirty cop to abuse this kind of setup?
Yesterday on the local radio, some disk jockeys were doing "research" and asking gay drag queen guest speakers if there was some sort of public restroom code used by gays.
"Yes", was the answer. If you tap, I forget if it was the right foot or the left foot, in the bathroom stall, you are advertising, "I want gay sex and I want it NOW!"
"I did not know that", replied the disk jockey. Neither did I.
Learn something new every day.
So, all of you are hereby warned.
If you are in a stall in a public restroom doing what you are supposed to be doing on a toilet, do not ..... repeat ...DO NOT ..... plug your iPod into your earphones and start listening to that really catchy tune you always tap your foot to.